Advice

On family politics

For Christmas, I told my mom I wanted “All the Devils Are Here.” She wants the George Bush biography. I drank a bottle of wine trying to keep quiet so I don’t spoil thanksgiving by bitching about politics. I may have let a comment slip along the lines of, “you want to learn the inner-workings of bush’s mind? buy a blank spiral notebook” and I’m pretty sure I called him a war criminal. My mom doesn’t understand why or how anyone could see him this way. I know I should have just shut up and let her ask for her damn book, but I feel over the past few years democrats have been far too passive and allowed the less-enlightened masses to believe whatever garbage sarah palin and the other idiots spew on fox news and reality tv.

I’ve already broken her heart by telling her I don’t want children and plan to move even further away than I have. Should I just bite my tongue and get more drunk?

I hate the holidays…

You had me right up until that last line. Why ya’ gotta hate?

Fuck, dude. You think you’ve got it Republican during the holidays? My folks have neighbors who could get George’s piece of shit book personally signed for your mom, and if I asked nicely, probably in her choice of crayon. Fox News is on twenty-four seven up in this bitch, and I still manage to have an absolute blast with my family.

You wanna know my secret? It’s easy. I know better than to feel responsible for the political opinions of my parents. They think differently than me, and I’m okay with it. I refuse to pit my family in a struggle of enlightenment versus ignorance.

They are who they are, and I love them unconditionally. I accept them unconditionally, because no matter what, they will always be my family.

Opinions come and go, and just because your mom has some shitty ones, you shouldn’t let it get in the way of the time you spend together.

I know it’s hard. Shit can drive you crazy sometimes, but you really have to see past the knee-jerk politics and recognize that the source of your response is purely emotional and entirely negative.

You are defending a position that you think is rational and right. Nope. If that were the case, you could do it calmly, without booze. It’s not that you’re wrong, and it’s not that on some level you’ve used reason, but whatever rationality your argument may have is subjugated by very heated emotion.

Next time you start bitching, take a step back and feel yourself reacting. Notice how it’s not coming from your rational mind. There’s inevitably a lot more going on, and whatever underlying anger you’re feeling is tied up in the fact that you’re dealing with family.

That’s the shit you gotta let go. It’s wasted emotion. It’s unprocessed negativity that you’re misdirecting into a regurgitated political sound bite. Fuck that shit. It serves no purpose other than to create more negativity.

This isn’t about you being right or wrong, either. Who gives a fuck? This is about you being in control of your own emotional state. You’re not. Instead, you’re getting hammered and mouthing off.

Listen, when it’s really important, you gotta do what you gotta do. Over the years, I’ve reversed my family’s position on gay marriage. I’ve talked them into being pro-choice. I’ve even managed to convince my mom that Sarah Palin is duplicitous and unqualified.

Where it counts and when it counts, I take the time to elevate the conversation above knee-jerk political talking-point bullshit and really change their minds, but you know what? Those conversations aren’t political. They’re philosophical, and I still know damn well that they’ll never vote anything other than Republican.

Also, that shit takes concerted effort and energy, so unless I’m willing to go the extra mile, I have a strict personal rule not to talk sex, religion, or politics around my family. I urge you to do the same. Ninety-nine percent of the time, you gotta let that shit go.

Quit feeling responsible for your mom’s opinions. Just enjoy her company.

Standard
Advice

On settling.

Quoting your fun sized advice: “A man would also understand what it really means to settle.” I’m a man and I don’t know what you’re talking about, so what does it mean to settle, or should I ask a real man?

It’s a play on words, chief. Settling has both negative and positive cultural connotations within its various phrasings.

Too often, people with prince charming disease get freaked out about “settling down,” and they use the phrase “to settle for” when they should use the phrase “to settle into.”

In other words, both men and women who expect romantic perfection are terrified about becoming established in a relationship, and they confuse the notion of being satisfied with less with merely being satisfied.

Standard
Fun-Sized Advice

On more fun sized advice.

Why the fuck won’t my peanut butter spread?
Because Wonder Bread is a lie.

whats the best way to knock a bitch off her high horse?
Scare the horse.

Bitch, answer ONE of my questions? I read your blog day in and out, you owe me that!
Okay.

if you knew you were going to die. Would you reveal your identity?
I am going to die, and if you understood the first thing about me, you’d know better than to look for revelation in identity.

TSA is freaking me the fuck out. If they ‘randomly select’ me, a really attractive college girl, how do I play it cool and mentally destroy them for victimizing me?
Mental destruction requires a mind. Don’t waste your time. Also, victimization requires a victim. Fuck that. Make your flight and write your congressman.

How many times a day is too many to masturbate?
As many times as it takes to start getting in the way of more important shit.

Could you see yourself in a romantic relationship with someone who doesn’t drink or do drugs, ever?
Oh yeah, for at least a few hours.

If I was to take dirt from the US, take to another country, and give birth on it…would that qualify as being born on US soil granting one citizenship?
Nope, not unless you could get the governor of a US state to make a declaration temporarily annexing the soil during the birth without causing an international incident. Probably not the easiest way to get the desired result, though.

I just made it through my first pregnancy scare. The test turned out negative, so why am I upset?
Because it crystalizes how you’re all grown up without really being an adult. That shit is upsetting.

I’m a girl. tell me how you would fuck me.
Girl or guy, I just start with your mind and move downward.

Any insight as to why high school absolutely wrecks some people for the rest of their lives?
It’s not high school. It’s adolescence. The transition from childhood to adulthood is a brutal fucking experience. That’s just the nature of the human condition, and some folks just don’t make it.

my best friend thinks i’ve been talking shit, when i love her like a sister, i’m so enraged i just want to give up on this friendship completely
Yeah, that last part about giving up on the friendship? That’s you talking shit, which means she’s right about you, even if she’s wrong. Chill the fuck out, drama queen.

At what age should a man stop looking for the perfect partner and just settle for someone half way attractive with a job that you can stand to share a place with?
A man would know better than to expect perfection in the first place. A man would also understand what it really means to settle. Grow the fuck up.

what about the vegans/vegetarians that are in it for the animals? i don’t think it’s pretentious of me to give a fuck about where my food comes from.
Of course you don’t, and yet you felt the need to defend your lifestyle choice to a random stranger on the internet who couldn’t give less of a fuck what you cram into your pie hole.

If Ayn Rand is a gateway philosophy, where do I go next?
Wherever your questions take you. If you can think to ask it, some brilliant mind of a former age has talked shit about it. Read up. Learn from the greats. Absorb, mix, and match. When it comes to philosophy, don’t be afraid to wear plaids and stripes. One day, you’ll find that you’ve developed your own world view that comes from the inside out.

Standard
Advice

On your friend’s shitty band.

what is the appropriate and tactful reply when a friend wants to know what you think of their band and they’re really not your thing?  i’m not the arbiter of all that’s cool and hip and i’m not aiming for “constructive criticism”, just a polite and encouraging response.  thanks.

Actually, your self deprecating remark is already a good place to start. Just add a noncommittal thumbs up, and you’re good to go.

Try something like, “I’m not the arbiter of all that’s cool and hip, but I think you guys have a really unique sound, and it’s clear you have a lot of passion.”

That should do it. It’s polite and encouraging, but it doesn’t mean a fucking thing.

If he keeps squeezing you for approval to the point where it gets annoying, it’s not at all rude to go ahead and let him know that you’re not really into them.

You’d actually be doing him a favor. Sometimes you just gotta train emotionally needy artists not to beg for validation.

Standard
Advice

On the principle of explosion

What would you say to someone who told you that a thing could be true and not true at the same time?

Yes, context is everything, and this question is as broad as the sword the next guy on the street keeps in his pants (just ask him), but let’s assume we’re talking on a bit grander scale than the ex who tried to back-paddle out of a premature “I love you.” Give me some premium-grade existential shit.

I’d say buy me a drink, because after a contradiction like that, anything goes.

(There are ten people on the planet who will get a joke that obscure, but fuck it. I’m home for Thanksgiving and bored out of my skull. This is what sobriety and insomnia does to me. As for whoever sent the question, I encourage that kind of ridiculousness for the next seventy-two hours.)

Standard
Advice

On cable

Mike Rowe or Ben Bailey?

Dirty Jobs or Cash Cab? Really? Even if I let those two double team me, I doubt they’d keep my interest after the first commercial break.

That square-jawed “Aw shucks, ma’am” likability is great for hosting The Discovery Channel, but trust me, sex with on-air talent gets really fucking boring unless you’re in a room full of mirrors.

On the other hand, Mike Rowe strikes me as an old-school pussy hound, and after some of the shit I’ve seen him do on Dirty Jobs, he might be the type who really puts the spit shine on your junk.

I guess I’ll go with Mike. Still, it’d be a little too much like doing one of my dad’s friends. You know, the good looking one that sells cars or some shit.

Standard
Best-Of Advice

On fun with christians

It’s ironic how you brand every Christian as close-minded by virtue of them being Christian.

I must ask, though. If being Christian requires a person to give up rational thinking, why have many of the greatest thinkers of history, those who are undoubtedly some of the most intelligent people who have ever lived, chosen Christianity? From Nicolaus Copernicus to Johannes Kepler, Galileo to Descartes, Blaise Pascal to Karol Wojtyla – all have greatly affected the world with contributions that require immense amounts of rational thinking, but all devoutly Christian. Why do you think this is so if Christianity is as you accuse it to be – devoid of any semblance of rationality?

Is it absolutely impossible then that for some people, Christianity is what is reasonable? That their answers to life’s mysteries aren’t canned, but are answers they have arrived at by means of their independent reason which simply coincide with the tenets of Christianity? That rationality is not surrendered to Christianity, but to Christianity is where rationality points?

Just because you couldn’t fathom the possibility doesn’t mean it does not exist, right? Like you said, you don’t know any more about the nature of the universe than I do, so why are you so sure that whatever Christianity teaches is absolutely false? Aren’t you missing the point of being open-minded then?

 

Really? You’re gonna cherry pick a few scientists and philosophers from the church’s bloodiest era and use them as evidence of its reason? Not for nothing, but it’s pretty easy to be a devout Christian when the alternative is being burned at the stake for heresy.

Great minds have always labored under the limitations of their time period. The faulty paradigms and corrupt institutions under which those thinkers were forced to bring light into the world deserve neither credit nor credence for their individual genius.

And Karol Wojtyla? What the fuck? Are we playing “one of these things is not like the others?” The dude was Pope. Sure, he was the cute and cuddly one, but that doesn’t make the catholic church any less evil. You wanna talk about affecting the world with contributions? Okay. On his watch, how about contributions like homophobia, misogyny, disease-spreading ignorance, and institutionalized child rape.

If after all the critical thinking of which your mind is capable, you still insist that Christianity is where rationality points, I’m not going to argue with you. It’s not my job to teach you how to grasp the concepts of either Christianity or rationality.

I will say this, though. Do your best not to throw around words like “ironic” when you have no fucking clue what they mean. Unless I turn out to be a nun, nothing I’ve said about Christianity qualifies as irony.

For the record, irony is when an idiot like you has the gall to invoke Galileo in an argument that rationality is not surrendered to Christianity.

Quite frankly, until you understand both the literary and historical implications of that level of egregious stupidity, you should just go sit in the corner while the earth keeps spinning around the sun.

Standard
Advice

On making a move.

So I’ve got a mad crush on this girl who lives on my hall. We’ve been hanging out and stuff, probably to the point where she thinks I’m just her friend. And I’m bad at picking up signals, but I get the feeling that there could be something here. (This is coming from a guy with zero, zero, zero experience. But I’ve already complained about that for years. It’s time to make a change.)

We went to Harry Potter last night and blazed together. Unfortunently we were with a bigger group as well of mostly her friends so I couldn’t try anything. That sounds stupid to me because I have no idea what I’d ‘try’.

So what’s the best option for me right now as far as making the next move? Remember…I am a total loser who hasn’t had any experience with girls and somehow I made it to college a virgin, because I’m that cool. I’m not solely out for sex, though; I like her.

Dude. You’re fucking precious. I just wanna tussle your hair and pinch your cheeks and shit.

Listen up, this isn’t about “trying” anything. Don’t make this about your virginity. Nobody gives a fuck about your lack of experience except for you, and trust me, you’re surrounded by virgins.

I can’t tell you how to make a move here, kid. That shit is on you. Accept your vulnerability, accept the possibility of rejection, and then just be brave and fucking do it. Making a move is an organic, in-the-moment kinda thing, but I will say this, if you think there’s a romantic spark between you and this girl, you’re the one who’s gonna have to acknowledge it.

Be sweet about it. Be honest. Use whatever words or actions that come to you naturally in that moment of bravery, but the gist of it doesn’t have to be any more complicated than, “Hey, I like you, and I think you like me too. Here we go!”

Do it with a kiss. Do it with your own words. However you do it, get it fucking done. Don’t worry about what happens next. For better or worse, the heat of that moment will become self sustaining once you get it started, unless of course you fuck it up by overthinking shit.

Whatever. You’re gonna do what you’re gonna do.

Tell you what, though, you’re not a total loser. That much is for sure. You just need to get out of your own head. Quit complaining, and savor the experience you’re about to have.

Learning this shit is ten times more exciting than already knowing how to do it.

Fucking enjoy yourself.

Standard
Fun-Sized Advice

On fun sized advice.

I’ve got the house, the wife and the money, so why am I not happy?
Yeah well, I’ve got cheddar cheese, a pumpkin, and some carrots, so why am I not the color orange? (And for those of you in New Jersey, I’m not suggesting that self tanner is the key to happiness.)

Are you as cool in real life as you are on your blog?
There is no way to answer this question without sounding like a giant douche.

I just know this has been asked the umpteenth time, but what kind of music do you listen to, if you have the time to anyway?
You know I have a personal blog, right? Here’s all the music I’ve posted.

Sometimes I think if I werent such an independent woman, maybe Id have a boyfriend once in a while…
Sometimes I wish I could spray my inbox with weed killer designed specifically for shitty voiceover from “Sex and the City.”

Is 28 too late to start over again? I mean to really start building everything (love, friends, acquaintances, income source, creative production, academia) from scratch?
It’s never too late, and it’s never from scratch.

Is it wrong to use drugs to fill emotional voids?
Wrong is a moral judgement. If you want one of those, I’d need more context. I will say that using drugs to fill an emotional void usually leads to negative consequences. Do with that what you will.

Do you think that teenagers fall in love or they just believe they do?
Yes.

What do you take personally?
My person.

You’re such a self righteous bitch.
Duh.

Do you have any friends? If so, do you pay them? I mean, you’re such a bitch how does anybody actually want to be around you?
I love my haters so fucking much. Oh, I just want to hug them and squeeze them like a basket full of puppies. You have no idea.

How can you swallow without gagging if you are sober and it is your first time?
Are we talking about sushi or cum? Seriously, what’s the big deal here?

Who would win in a fight? You or Dan Savage?
No, no. This is Hollywood, babe. Never fuck with the gay mafia.

Celebrity girl crush?
Olivia Wilde.

If you could change only 3 things about current government/policies, what would you change?
I’d replace the military-industrial complex with a civil-industrial complex as a stopgap for our crumbling infrastructure, I’d replace the prison-industrial complex with a beefed-up educational-industrial complex, and I would summarily end the legacy of state funded concept wars, including the wars on drugs, terror, poverty, crime, etc.

Did you ever make up questions just to give an answer, in the beginning of your blog? To get it going and to get people comfortable writing in?
Not that swearing on a stack of bibles would mean shit, but if my word means anything to you, I’m here to give it. I have never made up a single one of these ridiculous questions. My process is the only pure thing about me.

Why do you call it the hall of anti-fame instead of the hall of infamy?
So people like you would pause for a moment and reflect on the importance of such a distinction in this voyeuristic, fame obsessed, and digitally hyper-intrusive culture. Yeah, that’s right. I got recurring literary motifs up in this bitch.

You know, sometimes I just want to throw on Angels & Airwaves or 30 Seconds to Mars and rock the fuck out.  Is there anything wrong with enjoying cheesy-ass music from time to time?
We’ve all got guilty pleasures, babe. Fuck it. I know it’s bubblegum flavored shit, but to this day, I can’t help myself from singing along to the chorus of Kelly Clarkson’s “Since U Been Gone.”

Standard
Best-Of Advice

On ayn rand

HELP. I’m talking to an Ayn Rand bot. He’s an intelligent human being for the most part, just one of the many that have been sucked up into her selfish little vaccuum of self important motives. What is your opinion of Ayn Rand? What would you say to someone drinking her kool-aid? Much Appreciated.

I’ve said it before. I consider Rand and her philosophy to be the epistemological equivalent of methadone. A controlled dose of objectivism is a hell of a lot better than the dirty street junk most people shoot into their arms, but it’s still no way to live.

No doubt your friend is an intelligent person. Most people who bother to pick up a book these days are above average, and nobody goes hot tubbing with Ayn Rand without first peeling off their Sunday School clothes.

Still, she’s an easy trap. Her philosophy is very simple to grasp, and it’s incredibly satisfying to the ego. It’s candy being sold as health food, so naturally people gobble it up.

At its best, objectivism is a gateway philosophy. It’s epistemology with training wheels, the stuff teenagers read before moving on to the real thing.

At its worst, selfish assholes latch on to her value system of ethical egoism and rational self interest, and they get absolutely giddy with what they perceive to be her rejection of altruism. Their surface interpretation of her moral code gives them every excuse to be narcissistic pricks who pride themselves on taking without giving.

What they fundamentally misunderstand, and to an extent what Rand herself misunderstood, is that an ethical system based on living for the sake of one’s self as opposed to living for the sake of others is completely missing the point. There is no self. There is no other.

Obviously, if you start talking to a selfish asshole about egoless notions of one love or one universal consciousness, he’s just gonna shake his head and think you’re a new-age fruitcake. It’s a total fucking waste of time. After all, using mind-based arguments to try and rationally convince an ego that it doesn’t exist is impossible. This is why you’re gonna have trouble sobering up someone who’s been drinking kool-aid from the Fountainhead.

Still, the fundamental flaw in Rand’s thinking is that she was never able to separate ego from consciousness. She confused and combined those two inherently different philosophical constructs. I’ll spare you her metaphysical hoop-jumping, but her entire world view is based on the faulty ego-biased premise of our isolated individuality.

Sure, we’re each individuals. We’re born, we live, and we die as discrete units of self, but her philosophy places such primacy on egoism that the whole exercise becomes childish. She presents an “every man for himself” mentality, heroizes the individual, and then narratively extends the positive benefits of her philosophy to its illogical yet idealized conclusion.

I’ll happily concede that on a primal level, operating from a position of rational self-interest is perfectly acceptable. The law of the jungle never really ceases to apply, and there is no doubt a certain kind of virtue in selfishness, but none of it will get you higher than the first couple of rungs on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs.

They say man cannot live on bread alone. Well, man cannot find happiness, much less enlightenment, on rational self interest alone, regardless of how ethical. This isn’t about proving Rand wrong. It’s about showing your friend that objectivism is an incomplete philosophy.

Quite simply, there is more.

Standard